Evolutionists Still Clueless on Origin of Life
“Also against his three friends was his wrath kindled, because they had found no answer, and yet had condemned Job.”
How good are evolutionists at explaining the origin of life? Not very! Listen to what some have written and said. First up is professor Paul Davies from the University of Arizona. In his book The Fifth Miracle: The Search for the Origin and Meaning of Life, he wrote, “Obviously, Darwinian evolution can operate only if life of some sort already exists.” He continued: “Darwinism can offer absolutely no help in explaining that all-important first step: the origin of life.”
Now consider what evolutionist science writer Gordy Slack wrote in The Scientist: “Evolution should be able to explain, in theory at least, all the way back to the very first organism that could replicate itself through biological or chemical processes … and what came before it…. Right now, we are nowhere close.”
Here’s another honest statement – this one from Simon Morris, professor of evolutionary biology at Cambridge University: “Despite decades of experimentation, with accompanying shouts of ‘breakthrough’ or ‘almost there,’ we are still paddling on the edges of an ocean of ignorance.”
I close today’s broadcast with this marvelous quote from Henry Lipson, professor of physics at the University of Manchester: “I think we must admit that the only acceptable explanation is creation. I know that this is anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not reject a theory that we do not like if the experimental evidence supports it.”
Heavenly Father, I pray that when evolutionists run into walls that the tools of science can’t break through, they will turn to biblical creation for the truth. In Jesus’ Name. Amen.
Sources of all quotes can be found in Evolutionists Say the Oddest Things, Lita Cosner, editor, pp. 43-46 (Creation Book Publishers, 2015). Photo: Evolutionist Paul Davies from the University of Arizona (2006). (PD)