- Series:Animals, Transcript English
Genesis 6:19
“And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.”
Charles Darwin recognized that ants challenged his theory of natural selection. He even mentioned it in his Origin of Species. He even asked how the situation with the lowly ant could ever be reconciled with his theory. He never did come up with an answer, and neither have modern evolutionists.
.jpg)
Darwin’s problem was with the worker ants. Even though they are products of sexual reproduction, they differ greatly from their parents. They are each specialized with features their parents don’t have so they can carry out their designated tasks in the nest. The problem is that these workers are sterile females, so they cannot pass on the traits that are unique from their parents. Modern evolutionists theorize that perhaps there were some lucky mutations that took place in queen ants through their evolutionary history. However, this explanation is not very credible since the oldest fossilized ants are identical to today’s ants. That means that there is no evidence of evolution in ants over a period of 70 million “evolutionary” years. Of course, we at Creation Moments don’t accept claims that the world is that old.
Perhaps God, in His foreknowledge, designed ant society this way to foil Darwin and those who have thought like him throughout history. Whatever the case, here is evidence that the ant neither evolved nor could have possibly evolved.
Prayer:
Dear Father, with wisdom You have designed Your creation to bear witness to You. I, too, praise your Name. Amen.
Notes:
CRSnet, 2/9/00, “Evolution, Sex and the Ant.” Diagram: Worker ant morphology. (PD)
